First, do no mismatch
Known conflicts close the gate.
A cat household and a dog with reliable no-cat evidence. A 40-pound landlord limit and a 65-pound dog. A toddler and an adult-only placement requirement. Welfare urgency cannot reopen that gate.
Transparent by design
SASHA does not predict destiny. It makes a careful, inspectable comparison between the life a person can offer and the evidence available about an animal.
First, do no mismatch
A cat household and a dog with reliable no-cat evidence. A 40-pound landlord limit and a 65-pound dog. A toddler and an adult-only placement requirement. Welfare urgency cannot reopen that gate.
Then, compare the real life
Household, housing, schedule, activity, social style, experience, care capacity, and softer preferences are scored independently. Constraints matter more than preferences.
Confidence is separate
A foster's real-home observation carries more weight than generic biography language. Sparse data can produce a promising but uncertain result; it cannot produce a confident one.
Only within compatible animals
Long stay, special needs, bonded pairs, and rare capability overlap can modestly reorder compatible candidates. The adjustment is capped and always explained.
Every claim keeps its source
One ethic, three decisions
Household and care conflicts first; compatibility, evidence confidence, and capped welfare opportunity second.
Build a Life Profile →Dates, duration, household, transport, medication, experience, and source-confirmed need state remain explicit.
Build a Foster Profile →Published geography, species, situation eligibility, verification, and capacity come before relevance.
Find support →The ranking is never for sale.